Blazor and Angular are two popular web development frameworks that have been making headlines in the developer community for the past few years. Both of these frameworks offer unique features and capabilities, making them a top choice for developers looking to build modern and interactive web applications.
In this guide, we will take an in-depth look at Blazor vs Angular, comparing their key features, advantages, and use cases. By the end of this guide, you will have a better understanding of which framework is best suited for your next project.
What is Blazor?
Blazor is an open-source web development framework created by Microsoft. It offers developers the ability to build interactive and high-performance web applications using C# instead of JavaScript, providing a seamless transition for .NET developers. With Blazor’s component-based architecture, each part of the user interface is encapsulated into reusable components, promoting code reusability and maintainability. This innovative framework empowers developers to leverage their existing C# skills to create modern and dynamic web applications, all while enjoying the benefits of a familiar development environment.
Features of Blazor:
Uses C# instead of JavaScript, providing a familiar development environment. Supports server-side and client-side rendering for flexible deployment options. Offers a component-based architecture for reusable and maintainable code.
SignalR is available as a NuGet package: Offers a rich set of built-in UI components, or developers can create custom components to suit their specific needs.
No restrictions with HTML/CSS usage: With Angular, developers are afforded the freedom to unleash their creativity and bring their web pages to life with highly dynamic and interactive features. By harnessing the power of HTML and CSS, they can leverage their existing expertise in these markup languages, eliminating the need to acquire new syntax or techniques. This seamless development experience opens up a world of limitless possibilities, allowing for the crafting of engaging user interfaces and creating delightful user experiences that leave a lasting impression. Whether it’s stunning animations, intuitive navigation, or visually appealing designs, Angular empowers developers to push the boundaries of web development and deliver exceptional results.
Server-side pre-rendering for faster initial loading
One of the key differences between Blazer vs Angular lies in their approach to rendering web pages. Wh uses client-sidile Blazore rendering, Angular leverages server-side pre-rendering, which has its own set of advantages. Server-side pre-rendering allows for faster initial loading times, as the server sends a fully rendered HTML page to the browser instead of waiting for the JavaScript files to load and render on the client’s side. This is especially beneficial for users with slower internet connections or devices with limited processing power, ensuring a smooth and efficient browsing experience.
Virtualization for improved performance and scalability
Another notable difference between Blazer vs Angular is their handling of large datasets. With Blazor, all data is loaded onto the client-side, which can result in slower page loading times and decreased performance with larger datasets. On the other hand, Angular utilizes virtualization techniques to efficiently handle large amounts of data by only rendering what is currently visible on the screen. This not only improves performance but also enhances scalability as the application can handle growing datasets without compromising on user experience.
Lazy loading for optimized page loading times
Lazy loading is a technique used to improve page loading times by only loading the necessary components and modules when they are required. This can significantly reduce initial load times and optimize performance, especially for larger applications with multiple pages and components. While Angular has built-in support for lazy loading, Blazor currently does not have this feature but plans to introduce it in future updates.
Communication with gRPC-Web
gRPC-Web, an open-source framework for remote procedure calls, is gaining popularity as a communication protocol between client and server. While Angular has built-in support for gRPC-Web, Blazor currently does not have native support but can be integrated with the help of third-party libraries. This allows developers to leverage the benefits of gRPC-Web in their applications while using either framework.
Razor class libraries for code sharing
Razor class libraries (RCLs) are powerful and flexible reusable components that can be conveniently shared between different projects within the Blazor framework. This remarkable feature enables developers to effortlessly share common functionality and user interface elements across multiple applications, resulting in enhanced code reusability and significant reduction in development time. In contrast, Angular lacks an equivalent feature, making it comparatively more challenging to efficiently share code between projects, thereby impeding productivity and hindering code maintainability.
Full stack testing with Blazor
Blazor’s server-side hosting model and integration with ASP.NET Core enable developers to perform end-to-end testing of both client and server-side components in a single environment. This facilitates comprehensive full-stack testing, allowing developers to test the entire application’s functionality without having to set up separate environments for front-end and back-end testing. In contrast, Angular requires separate setups for front-end and back-end testing, which can be time-consuming and cumbersome.
Advantages of Blazor
Blazor, the modern web framework, is gaining popularity among developers due to its numerous advantages. With Blazor, developers can build interactive and high-performance web applications using C# and .NET. Its ability to run client-side code directly in the browser eliminates the need for JavaScript, resulting in a more streamlined development process. Additionally, Blazor’s component-based architecture promotes code reusability and maintainability, making it an excellent choice for building scalable and robust applications. Whether you’re a seasoned developer or just starting out, exploring the possibilities of Blazor can greatly enhance your web development journey.
Speed and performance
Blazor’s ability to run client-side code directly in the browser offers significant advantages in terms of speed and performance. With Blazor, developers can leverage the browser’s rendering capabilities, resulting in faster application load times and improved user experience. Additionally, Blazor uses a virtual DOM system that only updates components when necessary, further enhancing its speed and performance.
Works offline
Another significant advantage of Blazor is its ability to work offline. With Progressive Web App (PWA) support, developers can build web applications that can be accessed and used without an internet connection. PWA technology enables data caching and storage, allowing users to continue using the application even when not connected to the internet.
Same validation code can be applied to client and server-side
With Blazor, developers can write validation code that is shared between the client and server-side. This eliminates the need to duplicate code and reduces the chances of inconsistencies between client and server-side validations. Additionally, with Blazor’s built-in data binding capabilities, developers can easily handle form input validation without writing extensive JavaScript code.
.Net core can be directly run in a browser
Blazor, being built on top of .Net Core, provides developers with a powerful capability to execute .Net code directly in the browser. This unique feature enables seamless integration with existing .Net codebases, making it easier to leverage the full potential of .Net ecosystem for developing modern web applications. By combining the flexibility of client-side web development with the robustness of .Net, Blazor opens up a wide range of possibilities, empowering developers to create highly interactive and performant web experiences.
Good existing component libraries
As Blazor is a relatively new framework, it has limited existing component libraries compared to Angular. However, the community is rapidly growing and there are already some good component libraries available for Blazor, such as Telerik UI for Blazor and Syncfusion Essential Studio for Blazor. These libraries provide a wide range of pre-built components that can be easily integrated into an application, saving developers time and effort in developing these components from scratch.
Disadvantages of Blazor
Although Blazor has many advantages and is gaining popularity among developers, it also has some limitations that developers should consider before choosing it as their primary framework for web development.
Latency and performance
One of the major concerns with Blazor is its latency and performance. Since the runtime execution happens on the client-side, it may result in slow loading times for larger applications, especially if they have a lot of server-side calls. This can be mitigated by using progressive web app (PWA) techniques to cache data and resources, but it still remains a valid concern for developers.
Hot reloading
Hot reloading, which is a feature that allows developers to make changes to the code and see the results instantly without having to refresh the page, is not yet fully supported in Blazor. This can be frustrating for developers who are used to this feature in other frameworks like Angular.
Debugging
Debugging in Blazor is not as straightforward as it is in other frameworks like Angular. Since it uses WebAssembly, debugging requires additional tools and configurations, making the process more complex. It also lacks support for breakpoints and step-by-step debugging, which can hinder developers’ productivity.
No performance benefits for server-side rendering
While Blazor promises improved performance and user experience by executing the code on the client-side, this benefit is not applicable for server-side rendering. In fact, using server-side rendering in Blazor may result in slower page loading times compared to other frameworks like Angular.
Reduced scalability
Since Blazor is a relatively new framework, it still lacks the scalability and community support that Angular has. This means that developers may face challenges when trying to scale their applications or find solutions for specific issues. However, as Blazor gains more popularity and adoption, this issue will likely improve.
What is Angular?
Angular is a popular front-end framework developed and maintained by Google. It is used for building dynamic, modern web applications with a focus on performance, scalability, and developer productivity. Angular was first released in 2024 and has since become one of the most widely used frameworks for developing single-page applications (SPAs). It uses TypeScript as its primary language and utilizes many features such as dependency injection, reactive programming, and component-based architecture to provide developers with a robust toolset for building complex web applications.
Features of Angular
- Robust development environment: Angular offers a comprehensive toolset for developing, testing, and deploying applications. It includes features like the Angular CLI, which streamlines the creation and management of projects.
- Component-based architecture: Angular follows a component-based approach to application development. This means that each feature or functionality in an application is encapsulated within its own component, making it easier to maintain and reuse code.
- Dependency injection: Angular uses dependency injection to manage the dependencies between components. This reduces coupling between different parts of an application and makes it easier to add new features or make changes without affecting other components.
MVC architecture
Angular, a popular web development framework, follows the widely adopted Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture. This architectural pattern offers a well-defined separation of concerns, ensuring that the data (model), presentation logic (view), and application logic (controller) are distinct and independent. Such a clear separation facilitates seamless maintenance and thorough testing of each component, ultimately resulting in more robust and reliable applications.
Codeless development
Angular offers a feature called the Angular Material UI component library, which allows developers to create beautiful, responsive user interfaces without writing any custom CSS or JavaScript code. It provides a set of pre-built UI components like buttons, menus, and forms that can be easily customized and integrated into applications.
Speed and performance
Angular is widely recognized for its exceptional rendering speed and high-performance capabilities. One of the key factors contributing to its efficiency is the implementation of a virtual DOM, which significantly minimizes the requirement for resource-intensive DOM operations. As a result, Angular enables faster page loading times and delivers seamless user interactions, enhancing the overall user experience. With its optimized performance, Angular empowers developers to create dynamic and responsive web applications that effortlessly cater to the demands of modern-day users.
Routing and navigation
Angular’s in-built routing module enables developers to build single-page applications with ease. It offers powerful features such as lazy loading, which loads only the required modules and components, thus reducing initial load time. Additionally, Angular allows for implementing nested routing that facilitates structure and organization within complex applications. Its robust routing capabilities make it a reliable framework for developing large-scale web applications.
One of the major advantages of using Angular is that it does not impose any browser exclusivity, meaning that developers can build applications that run on all modern browsers, including Google Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and more. This eliminates the need for additional compatibility testing and ensures a consistent user experience across different platforms.
Deep linking
Angular’s deep linking feature allows for creating and sharing URLs that correspond to specific pages or components within the application. This enables users to directly access a specific page without having to navigate through multiple pages manually. It also makes the application more SEO-friendly, as search engines can easily index the individual pages within the application.
Data binding
Data binding is another essential aspect of Angular that makes it stand out from other frameworks. The framework offers both one-way and two-way data binding, allowing developers to easily handle user inputs and update the application’s view accordingly. This significantly reduces the amount of code required for handling data and enhances development efficiency.
Directives
Angular’s powerful directives allow developers to extend HTML with custom attributes and elements. This makes it easier to create reusable components and maintain a clean and organized codebase. Additionally, Angular provides built-in directives for commonly used functionalities such as showing or hiding elements, looping through collections, and more.
Advantages of Angular
Rich and comprehensive featureset with a wide range of tools and functionalities. Robust community support with active development and frequent updates.. Highly scalable and maintainable due to its modular structure and built-in dependency injection system.
Large community and ecosystem
Angular has a large and active community of developers and contributors, making it easy to find help or resources when needed. The ecosystem also includes a variety of third-party libraries and tools that extend the framework’s capabilities even further.
Developed by Google
Angular is developed and maintained by Google, which adds to its credibility and stability. With the backing of one of the biggest tech companies in the world, Angular is constantly evolving and improving to meet the demands of modern web development.
i18n support
Angular has built-in support for internationalization (i18n), making it easier to translate and localize applications for different languages and regions. This is a crucial feature for developing global applications.
Two-way data binding
Angular two-way data binding is a powerful feature that establishes a seamless connection between the model and the view. It simplifies the process of handling user input and automatically updating the user interface based on the changes in the data. This not only enhances user experience but also eliminates the need for developers to write repetitive code for data synchronization, saving valuable time and effort. With Angular’s two-way data binding, developers can focus more on building robust and efficient applications without worrying about manual data manipulation.
Dependency injection
Dependency injection is a design pattern that allows for more flexible and maintainable code by reducing coupling between different components. Angular has its own built-in dependency injection system, making it easier to manage dependencies within the application. This promotes cleaner code, better testability, and easier maintenance in the long run.
Use of typescript
Typescript is a superset of JavaScript that adds strong typing, classes, and interfaces to the language. Angular is built with Typescript, which makes it more scalable and maintainable for large-scale applications. Typescript also provides better error checking and code completion, making development faster and less prone to errors.
Lazy loading support
Angular supports lazy loading, which is a technique that loads certain parts of the application only when needed, improving overall performance and reducing initial load times. This is especially useful for larger applications with multiple modules, as it allows for faster navigation between different sections.
Powerful router
Angular’s router is a powerful tool for managing navigation between different views within the application. It supports features such as lazy loading, nested routes, and route guards for authentication and authorization purposes. This makes it easier to create complex and dynamic applications with multiple pages and views.
Disadvantages of Angular
Angular has a steep learning curve, especially for developers who are new to front-end development. Its use of Typescript and complex concepts such as dependency injection can be challenging for beginners to grasp. Memory leakage can be an issue in Angular, as the framework relies heavily on observables for data handling. If not managed correctly, this can lead to memory leaks and performance issues. Integrating third-party libraries or plugins into an Angular project can also be difficult at times, as it requires a deep understanding of the framework’s architecture and structure.
Security concerns
As Angular is a front-end framework, it relies heavily on client-side code for rendering and data handling. This makes it vulnerable to security threats such as cross-site scripting attacks if proper security measures are not implemented. Developers must be careful when handling user input and properly secure their applications to avoid potential security breaches.
No in-depth documentation
While Angular has extensive documentation, it may lack in-depth explanations for certain concepts and features. This can make it difficult for developers to troubleshoot issues or understand the inner workings of the framework. It also means that third-party resources, such as tutorials and guides, may vary in quality and accuracy.
Steep learning curve for updates
Angular regularly releases new updates and versions, which can be challenging for developers to keep up with. These updates often come with significant changes, requiring developers to learn new concepts and restructure their projects. This can be time-consuming and may cause delays in project delivery.
Multiple versions and dependencies
Angular has different versions, with each having its own set of dependencies. This can be confusing for developers, especially when trying to migrate from one version to another. Managing dependencies and ensuring compatibility between versions can also be challenging.
Lack of flexibility
Angular is opinionated in nature, meaning it enforces a specific design pattern and structure for projects. While this ensures consistency and maintainability, it may limit the flexibility and creativity of developers. Customizing or deviating from Angular’s prescribed architecture may require extensive workarounds or even lead to breaking the framework’s functionality.
Blazor vs Angular: A Detailed Comparison in 2024
When comparing Blazer vs Angular, it is important to consider the strengths and weaknesses of each framework. While both are popular choices for building web applications, they have distinct differences that may make one more suitable for a particular project than the other.
1. Community Support and Resources
Angular has a well-established community with numerous resources, including tutorials, guides, and forums. This is due to its longer history and larger user base compared to Blazor. However, with the increasing popularity of Blazor, its community is also growing rapidly. Microsoft offers official documentation and support for Blazor, making it easier for developers to find solutions to any issues they may encounter.
2. Maturity and Adoption
Angular has been around since 2024, making it a more mature framework compared to Blazor which was released in 2024. This means Angular has had more time to develop and improve its features, resulting in a stable and widely adopted framework. On the other hand, Blazor is still relatively new and may have some limitations or bugs that are yet to be discovered.
3. PWA Support
Progressive Web Applications (PWA) are becoming increasingly popular due to their ability to provide a native app-like experience on the web. Angular has built-in support for PWA, making it easier for developers to create these types of applications. Blazor, on the other hand, does not have native support for PWA, but there are workarounds and third-party libraries available.
4. Scoped Styles
Angular uses a component-based architecture where styles are scoped to the specific component they are defined in. This makes it easier to manage and avoid conflicts between different components. Blazor, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for scoped styles, although there are ways to achieve this functionality.
5. Async Nature
Angular follows a strict asynchronous model which can be beneficial for performance and scalability. Blazor, on the other hand, uses synchronous DOM updates by default, which may cause slower rendering times for complex applications.
6. UI Building Tools
Both Angular and Blazor have their own set of UI building tools. Angular has the popular Material Design library, while Blazor has its own component library called Radzen. These tools can greatly simplify the process of creating complex user interfaces in both frameworks.
7. App Creation and Deployment
Due to its nature as a client-side framework, Angular requires the use of a server for hosting and deployment. Blazor, on the other hand, can be deployed as a standalone application without the need for a server, making it easier to deploy and maintain.
8. Build / Coding Time
When it comes to build and coding time, Angular is known for its steep learning curve. It has a complex folder structure and requires knowledge of TypeScript and other tools like CLI, which can be overwhelming for beginners. Blazor, on the other hand, uses familiar technologies like C# and .NET Core, making it easier for .NET developers to get started.
Blazor vs Angular – Comprehensive Comparison Table
| Parameter | Angular | Blazor |
| Language Used | TypeScript, HTML, CSS | C#, HTML, CSS |
| Framework Type | Client-side MVC framework | Server-side and client-side framework |
| Rendering Methodology | One-way data binding with DOM updates through change detection mechanism. Asynchronous rendering. Angular Universal allows server-side rendering for improved performance and SEO. | Two-way data binding with synchronous DOM updates by default. Can be configured to use asynchronous rendering with SignalR integration. Server-side prerendering is also possible but requires additional configuration |
| Learning Curve / Build Time Required | Steep learning curve due to complex folder structure and use of TypeScript and CLI tools | Relatively easier for .NET developers due to use of familiar technologies like C# and .NET Core |
| Routing and Navigation | Built-in routing and navigation capabilities with Angular Router module | Uses Razor Pages or MVC pattern for server-side navigation. Client-side navigation can be achieved through built-in Blazor Router component or external libraries like Telerik UI for Blazor. |
| Server-Side Rendering | Angular Universal allows server-side rendering, improving performance and SEO | Server-side prerendering is available but requires additional configuration |
| Code Reusability | Can reuse code between web and mobile applications through NativeScript framework | Can reuse code between web, desktop, and mobile applications through .NET MAUI framework |
| Deployment | Requires Node.js, npm, and Angular CLI for build and deployment process | Can be deployed as self-contained binaries without requiring .NET runtime environment |
| Community Support | Large community of developers with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available | Growing community with increasing number of developers migrating from Angular or adopting Blazor for new projects. Official Microsoft documentation and tutorials available. |
When should you choose Blazer vs Angular?
Blazor and Angular are both powerful front-end technologies with their own unique features and benefits. When deciding between the two, it ultimately comes down to your specific project needs and goals.
If you are a .NET developer looking for a familiar environment and wanting to leverage your existing knowledge of C# and .NET Core, then Blazor would be a great choice. It offers a smooth learning curve and allows for code reuse across various platforms through .NET MAUI.
On the other hand, if you are looking for a robust framework with extensive community support, documentation, and resources, then Angular would be an ideal choice.
When to use Blazor?
- If you want to build a single-page application (SPA) using .NET technologies. If you prefer server-side rendering for improved performance and SEO. If you want to reuse code between web, desktop, and mobile applications through .NET MAUI framework.
When to use Angular?
- If you want to build large-scale, complex web applications with extensive community support and resources. If you need a rich set of pre-built components and tools for frontend development. If you prefer client-side rendering for dynamic user interfaces.
In the end, bothBlazor vs Angular are excellent choices for modern web development. It is essential to evaluate your project requirements carefully and choose the technology that best suits your needs. As technology continues to evolve, it is also worth keeping an eye on any updates or advancements in both frameworks that may sway your decision in the future.
How iTechnolabs can help you build software applications?
iTechnolabs is a leading technology consulting and development company that can help you navigate the nuances between Blazer vs Angular. Our team of experienced developers and consultants have in-depth knowledge of both frameworks, allowing us to provide unbiased guidance and recommendations based on your project requirements.
With our expertise in web development, we can assist you in creating modern and dynamic user interfaces using either Blazor or Angular. Additionally, we stay updated with the latest advancements in both frameworks, ensuring that our clients always receive cutting-edge solutions.
So whether you are looking to migrate an existing application to a new framework or starting from scratch, iTechnolabs can be your trusted partner throughout the journey. Contact us today to learn more about how we can help you make the best decision for your web development needs. Let us help you harness the power of Blazer vs Angular to create unparalleled user experiences in 2024 and beyond!
Furthermore, iTechnolabs also offers training and workshops on both frameworks, providing you with the necessary skills to become proficient in Blazor or Angular development. Our tailored courses cater to all levels of expertise, from beginners to advanced developers. So why not take this opportunity to upskill yourself and stay ahead of the curve in the ever-evolving world of web development.
At iTechnolabs, we have a systematic approach to help our clients understand the differences between Blazer vs Angular. Here are the steps we follow:
- Consultation: We begin with a thorough consultation to understand the specific needs and requirements of your project. This includes your performance needs, architecture preferences, and the skillset of your development team.
- Deep Dive: Our experts conduct an in-depth analysis of both Blazer vs Angular, focusing on the features that are pertinent to your requirements. This can include components, data binding, routing, forms, dependency injection, and more.
- Comparison: We then present a detailed comparison of Blazer vs Angular, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each framework in relation to your project’s needs. This can cover aspects like performance, scalability, learning curve, community support, and future growth prospects.
- Recommendation: Based on our analysis and your specific needs, we provide a recommendation on which framework would best suit your project. We ensure this recommendation is unbiased and solely based on what would provide the best results for your project.
- Training: Should the chosen framework be new to your team, we provide comprehensive training to ensure your team is equipped with the necessary skills to effectively work with the chosen framework.
- Ongoing Support: Even after your project is off the ground, we continue to provide support and guidance, ensuring any issues are swiftly addressed and your web application remains up-to-date with the latest enhancements in the chosen framework.
- Scalability: When considering the scalability factor of Blazor vs Angular, we meticulously analyze how each framework would handle the increasing demands of your application as your business expands. Scalability involves assessing the ability of the system to grow and manage more requests per minute (RPM). Whether you’re expecting steady growth or viral spikes, the framework should be able to accommodate growth without compromising the performance.
- Future Growth Prospects: The future growth prospects of the chosen framework are crucial in determining its long-term viability. In this step, we delve into the ongoing development, community support, and overall momentum of both Blazer vs Angular. This includes scrutinizing the frequency of updates, the size and responsiveness of the community, and the continued relevance of the framework in line with technological advancements. This will ensure that the framework you choose is not just suitable for your current needs, but also adaptable to future trends and technologies. It’s about making a choice that keeps your application relevant and competitive in the future.
- Identify Your Project Needs: The first step in determining the cost of using Blazor vs Angular is to identify the specific needs and requirements of your project. This includes understanding the complexity, size, and scope of your web application.
- Evaluate Framework Capabilities: Once you have identified your project needs, the next step is to evaluate the capabilities of both Blazer vs Angular. This will involve studying the features, tools, and functionalities offered by each framework to determine which one best meets your project requirements.
- Consider Development Time: The time taken to develop a web application using Blazor or Angular can also impact the overall cost. Generally, Blazor is considered to have a faster development time due to its use of C# and .NET. Angular, on the other hand, may require more time due to its steep learning curve and reliance on TypeScript.
- Assess Development Cost: The cost of development can vary significantly depending on factors such as complexity, customization, and developer rates. It is important to carefully assess these costs for both Blazer vs Angular to determine which one offers a more cost-effective option for your project.
- Factor in Maintenance and Support: Another aspect to consider is the cost of maintenance and support for both frameworks. This includes updates, bug fixes, and ongoing support from the framework community. It is important to factor in these costs when evaluating Blazor vs Angular.
- Compare Hosting Options: The hosting options available for Blazer vs Angular can also impact the overall cost of your project. Blazor can be hosted on a wide variety of platforms, including Azure and AWS, while Angular is primarily hosted on Google Cloud Platform.
- Consider Team Experience: The experience and expertise of your development team should also be taken into account when comparing Blazor vs Angular. If your team has more experience with .NET and C#, then Blazor may be a better choice. However, if your team is more familiar with JavaScript and TypeScript, then Angular may be a more suitable option.
- Evaluate Community Support: The strength of the community support for each framework can also impact the success of your project. Blazor has a growing community, but it may not have as many resources and support as Angular, which has been established for many years.
- Think About Long-Term Maintenance: When considering Blazor vs Angular, it is important to think about the long-term maintenance of your project. Both frameworks are constantly evolving and adding new features, so you will need to stay up-to-date with updates and changes to ensure the longevity of your project.
- Consider Project Requirements: Ultimately, the decision between Blazer vs Angular will depend on the specific requirements of your project. Consider factors such as performance, scalability, and user experience to determine which framework will best meet your needs.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both Blazor vs Angular have their own strengths and weaknesses, making it difficult to definitively say which one is better. It ultimately depends on the specific needs and preferences of your development team and project requirements. It is recommended to carefully evaluate the factors mentioned above before making a decision between Blazor vs Angular.Â
